When *The Devil Wears Prada* (2006) stormed into pop culture, it became an instant classic—a razor-sharp satire of the fashion industry wrapped in a coming-of-age narrative. While Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep) and Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway) rightfully dominate discussions, one character often fades into the background despite his pivotal role: Nate Cooper, Andy’s boyfriend, played by Adrian Grenier.
At first glance, Nate appears as the quintessential "nice guy" foil to Andy’s high-fashion transformation—a symbol of her pre-New York life. But a closer examination reveals that Nate is far more than a plot device. He embodies the film’s central tension between authenticity and ambition, personal values and professional compromise. His style, dialogue, and even his culinary choices (yes, the cheese fries) serve as deliberate contrasts to the cutthroat world of Runway magazine.
This deep dive explores Nate’s multifaceted role: his fashion as anti-fashion, his symbolism in Andy’s arc, his real-world parallels to the publishing industry, and why his character resonates with audiences even 18 years later. By the end, you’ll see why Nate isn’t just Andy’s boyfriend—he’s the moral compass of *The Devil Wears Prada*.
Nate Cooper: The Anti-Fashion Boyfriend
1. The Deliberate Styling Choices (Or Lack Thereof)
Nate’s wardrobe is a masterclass in visual storytelling through contrast. While Andy’s transformation from frumpy journalist to chic Runway assistant is the film’s most iconic arc, Nate’s style remains stagnant—and that’s the point. His clothing is a physical manifestation of his resistance to the fashion industry’s superficiality.
-
Casual Uniform: Nate’s go-to look consists of:
- Faded band T-shirts (often layered under unbuttoned flannels)
- Dark-wash jeans with a slightly baggy fit (a nod to early 2000s indie masculinity)
- Chuck Taylors or beat-up sneakers (the antithesis of Andy’s later Louboutins)
- A well-worn leather jacket (symbolizing his "real world" authenticity)
- Color Palette: Muted earth tones—olive greens, grays, and blacks—dominate his wardrobe, reinforcing his grounded nature. Even his one dressier moment (the ill-fated birthday dinner) features a simple button-down, untucked.
- Hair and Grooming: His perpetually tousled hair and light stubble emphasize his "I don’t care" attitude toward appearances, a stark contrast to Nigel’s (Stanley Tucci) polished coif or Miranda’s icy blonde bob.
Why It Matters: Nate’s style isn’t just lazy costuming; it’s a deliberate rejection of the fashion industry’s excess. His clothes scream, "I’m not part of this world," which makes Andy’s transformation all the more jarring when she starts critiquing his "sweatpants" (which, let’s be honest, are just normal jeans).
2. The Cheese Fries Scene: A Microcosm of Their Relationship
The now-legendary cheese fries moment isn’t just a funny breakup line—it’s a symbolic clash of values. When Andy scoffs at Nate’s greasy diner food, she’s not just mocking his diet; she’s rejecting the life they shared. The scene works on multiple levels:
- Class Divide: Cheese fries represent Nate’s working-class roots (he’s a line cook, later a chef) and Andy’s upward mobility. Her disgust mirrors her growing distance from her pre-Runway self.
- Authenticity vs. Aspiration: Nate’s food is unpretentious, just like him. Andy’s new world demands $50 salads and espresso martinis—things Nate would never embrace.
- Foreshadowing: This is the first crack in their relationship, signaling that Andy’s transformation isn’t just superficial—it’s erasing parts of her identity.
Fun fact: Adrian Grenier improvised the line, "You’re laughing at my cheese fries, but you used to love them." It became one of the film’s most quoted moments because it perfectly encapsulates the pain of growing apart.
Nate as a Symbol: What He Represents in Andy’s Journey
1. The "Before" in Andy’s Before-and-After
Nate is the embodiment of Andy’s past—her Ohio roots, her journalistic integrity, and her pre-fashion moral compass. His presence in the film serves as a constant reminder of who Andy was before Miranda Priestly reshaped her. Key moments highlight this:
- The Phone Call Scene: When Andy ignores Nate’s call to take Miranda’s coat to the car, it’s the first time she chooses her job over her relationship. The camera lingers on her guilty face, emphasizing the cost of her ambition.
- The Birthday Dinner: Nate’s disappointment when Andy arrives late (and distracted) is the turning point. His gift—a first-edition Harry Potter book—represents their shared love of simplicity, which Andy is outgrowing.
- The Breakup: When Nate ends things, he’s not just leaving Andy; he’s severing her last tie to her old self. The fact that he does it after she quits Runway (but before she truly changes) is crucial—it shows that some bridges, once burned, can’t be unburned.
2. The Moral Compass
While Nigel serves as Andy’s fashion mentor and Miranda as her professional devil, Nate is her ethical anchor. His role is to:
- Call Out Hypocrisy: When Andy defends Miranda after the Paris betrayal, Nate is the only one who says, "You’ve changed. You’re not even the same person." He voices what the audience is thinking.
- Represent "Real" Success: Nate’s career as a chef is humble but fulfilling. He doesn’t need a corner office or a Chanel bag to feel validated, which contrasts sharply with Andy’s obsession with Miranda’s approval.
- Offer Redemption: In the film’s final scene, Nate’s smile when Andy shows up in her old clothes (but with a new confidence) signals that she’s found a balance. His approval isn’t about her wardrobe—it’s about her reclaiming her integrity.
Without Nate, *The Devil Wears Prada* would lose its emotional core. He’s the reason Andy’s transformation feels like a moral dilemma, not just a makeover montage.
Nate and the Real-World Fashion Industry: Why His Character Resonates
1. The "Boyfriend Back Home" Trope in Fashion
Nate’s character fits a well-documented archetype in fashion media: the supportive but ultimately discarded partner who represents the life left behind. Real-life examples abound:
- Anna Wintour’s Ex-Husband: David Shaffer, a psychiatrist, was famously described as the "normal" counterpart to Wintour’s high-powered career. Their divorce mirrored the strain of her rising status at Vogue.
- Carine Roitfeld’s Partner: The former Vogue Paris editor’s longtime partner, Christian Restoin, was a photographer—creative but not part of the fashion elite. Their relationship ended as her career peaked.
- Personal Anecdotes: Many fashion assistants and editors report that relationships suffer during their early careers. The industry’s demands (late nights, constant travel, social climbing) often leave little room for "normal" partnerships.
Nate’s arc reflects this reality: fashion doesn’t just change how you dress—it changes who you can love.
2. The Class Divide in Publishing
*The Devil Wears Prada* is often read as a critique of fashion’s elitism, and Nate embodies the outsider’s perspective. His job as a chef (a physically demanding, underpaid profession) contrasts with the glamorous but soul-crushing world of Runway. This mirrors real tensions in publishing:
- Salary Disparities: Entry-level fashion jobs pay notoriously poorly (Andy’s salary is implied to be meager), while partners in other industries (like Nate’s culinary work) often earn more but lack prestige.
- Cultural Capital: Nate doesn’t care about designer labels or industry parties, which makes him an outsider in Andy’s new world. This reflects how fashion insiders often bond over shared cultural references that exclude "normies."
- The "Sellout" Dilemma: Many journalists and creatives face the same choice as Andy: stay true to their roots or assimilate for success. Nate’s breakup forces Andy to confront this.
In this light, Nate isn’t just a boyfriend—he’s a stand-in for the life Andy sacrifices to chase her dreams.
Adrian Grenier’s Performance: The Subtle Genius of Nate
1. The Art of Underacting
Grenier’s performance is a masterclass in restrained acting. While Streep and Hathaway deliver powerhouse performances, Grenier’s Nate is quietly effective. His choices include:
- Minimal Facial Expressions: Nate’s disappointment is often conveyed through slight shifts—a clenched jaw, averted eyes—rather than dramatic outbursts. This makes his emotions feel authentic and relatable.
- Physicality: His slumped posture in the breakup scene (leaning against the doorframe) contrasts with Andy’s rigid, Runway-trained stance, visually emphasizing their drift apart.
- Voice: Grenier’s natural, slightly raspy tone grounds Nate in reality. He doesn’t sound like a movie boyfriend; he sounds like a real guy who’s slowly losing his girlfriend to her job.
2. The Uncredited Improvisation
Many of Nate’s most iconic moments were improvised or semi-improvised, adding layers to his character:
- The Cheese Fries Line: As mentioned earlier, this was Grenier’s ad-lib. It worked because it sounded like something a real, hurt boyfriend would say.
- The Birthday Dinner Reaction: Grenier’s quiet "Wow" when Andy arrives late was unscripted. It’s a tiny moment, but it speaks volumes about their fading connection.
- The Final Smile: The film’s last shot of Nate was Grenier’s idea. He wanted to show that Nate isn’t bitter—he’s happy Andy found herself, even if it wasn’t with him.
Grenier’s understated approach ensures that Nate never feels like a caricature. He’s the heart of the film, precisely because he’s not trying to steal the scene.
What If Nate and Andy Had Stayed Together? (And Why They Didn’t)
1. The Problem with a "Happy Ending"
Many fans argue that Nate and Andy should have reconciled, but the film’s ending is thematically necessary. Here’s why:
- Andy Needed to Stand Alone: The film’s message is about self-discovery, not romantic validation. If Andy had "won Nate back," it would have undermined her growth.
- Nate Deserved Better: By the end, Nate has moved on (implied by his new girlfriend). The film respects his agency—he’s not a prize to be reclaimed.
- Realism: Most relationships that survive early career chaos do so because both partners evolve together. Nate and Andy were on fundamentally different paths.
2. The Alternate Ending That Almost Was
Early drafts of the script included a scene where Nate and Andy reunite after she quits Runway. However, test audiences reacted poorly because:
- It felt too neat for a film about messy, real-world trade-offs.
- It undermined Andy’s independence. Her arc wasn’t about getting the guy; it was about finding her voice.
- The current ending—where Nate smiles but they don’t reunite—is more mature and bittersweet, which aligns with the film’s tone.
The final version respects that some relationships are meant to be temporary, and that’s okay.
Fashion Lessons from Nate: What His Style Teaches Us
1. Confidence Over Labels
Nate’s wardrobe proves that style isn’t about price tags. His looks are simple but cohesive, teaching us:
- Fit Matters More Than Brand: His jeans and tees fit well, even if they’re not designer. This is a lesson Andy (and many fashion newcomers) learn the hard way.
- Consistency = Personal Brand: Nate’s uniform (leather jacket + tee) becomes his signature. In an industry obsessed with trends, his authenticity is his style.
- Comfort is Key: Nate’s clothes look lived-in because they are. He’s not suffering for fashion—he’s dressing for his life, not someone else’s expectations.
2. The Power of Contrast
Nate’s style works because it contrasts with the world around him. This is a lesson in intentional dressing:
- Stand Out by Not Fitting In: In a room full of Runway employees, Nate’s casual look makes him memorable. The same rule applies in real life—sometimes the boldest choice is to be yourself.
- Use Style to Tell a Story: Nate’s clothes say, "I’m not part of this." What does your wardrobe say about you?
- Know Your Audience: Nate’s style works for his world (the kitchen, his friends) but clashes with Andy’s new one. The takeaway?
0 comments